[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180817160842.GK3978217@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:08:42 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, joel@...lfernandes.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Make call_srcu() available during very early boot
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:06:18AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Is there a way we could make a union, or reuse one of the other fields,
> > as we know that synchronize_srcu() can't be used yet (and if it is,
> > either warn, or just make it a nop). And when we call srcu_init() and
> > remove the srcu_struct from the list, we can then initialize whatever
> > we used as the temporary boot up list field.
>
> I will take a look. If nothing else, I could union it with the
> struct work_struct, since it cannot be used that early anyway. ;-)
>
> Or I could just use the work_struct that is already inside the struct
> work_struct. Tejun, would you be OK with that?
Hmm... not super against it given how specialized the whole thing is
but maybe just making it a union is cleaner?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists