linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] 9p updates for 4.19

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzLe7C03-53=0WrXXfZcfsJfTsvRqrrBNqnLvOxUiCJqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:37:05 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
Cc:     V9FS Developers <v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] 9p updates for 4.19

So this pull request confuses me, and that's not a good thing.

On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 7:33 PM Dominique Martinet
<asmadeus@...ewreck.org> wrote:
>
> Pull request for inclusion in 4.19 for 9p

So when I pull the tag, I get a different message, talking about

  This tag is the same as 9p-for-4.19 without the two MAINTAINERS patches

but I never saw a first version.

And it comes from a github address, with a pgp key that I've not seen
before, and without me having been told about said maintainership
updates. And while the  key has a lot of signatures, none of them are
any that I have recognized previously from kernel development.

I'm sure it's all ok, but honestly, there's no way I can pull this
without a bit more clarification.

             Linus