[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180817064344.GC10811@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 08:43:44 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: apm: mark proc_apm_show as __maybe_unused
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:18:45AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A new build error appeared with CONFIG_PROC_FS disabled:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c:1643:12: error: 'proc_apm_show' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>
> This marks the function as __maybe_unused to let the compiler drop
> it silently.
>
> Fixes: 3f3942aca6da ("proc: introduce proc_create_single{,_data}")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
I have to admit I actually prefer ifdefs over magic __maybe_unused
annotations. But otherwise this looks correct to me, same for the
other patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists