linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: remove pci_alloc_consistent semantic to dectect in zalloc-simple.cocci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180818145243.GA2150@himanshu-Vostro-3559>
Date:   Sat, 18 Aug 2018 20:22:43 +0530
From:   Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
To:     zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
Cc:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>, nicolas.palix@...g.fr,
        michal.lkml@...kovi.net, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Coccinelle: remove pci_alloc_consistent semantic to
 dectect in zalloc-simple.cocci

On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 10:10:26PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
> On 2018/8/18 22:01, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 18 Aug 2018, zhong jiang wrote:
> >
> >> On 2018/8/18 20:52, Himanshu Jha wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 08:01:40PM +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
> >>>> Because pci_alloc_consistent has been deprecated. We prefer to use
> >>>> dam_alloc_coherent directly. Therefore, we should remove pci_alloc_consistent
> >>>   ^^^ typo "dma"
> >>>
> >>> Also, typo in the patch subject "dectect" -> "detect"
> >>  Thanks,  will fix it in v2.
> >>> Otherwise,
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for cleaning up, we still have few more *_alloc/memset
> >>> in the mainline, especially in the scsi subsystem, even after
> >>> I cleaned up with two long patch series in the past.
> >>>
> >>    I post same patches like *_alloc/memset in the scsi subsystem. Unfortunately,
> >>    Maintainer maybe do not care about the change.  therefore,  None of my patches
> >>   are received and rarely feedback.
> > Maybe they will be picked up later.
>  Hope so.  It's been more than a month since I post the patches. Maybe I should give a kindly ping. :-)

Heh! The problem is Martin only when picks up patches if the driver
maintainer Acks them, and it happens very rarely until you have
a *real* bugfix.

But since these patches are simple, so Martin should pick it up
even if the patch doesn't receive any feedback.

If you ping, then certainly Martin will give you the same feedback.

Maybe you can make them happy by sending a syzbot bugfix ;)

-- 
Himanshu Jha
Undergraduate Student
Department of Electronics & Communication
Guru Tegh Bahadur Institute of Technology