[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180819022440.GG128050@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 21:24:40 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Hari Vyas <hari.vyas@...adcom.com>,
Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>,
Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@...adcom.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
Marta Rybczynska <mrybczyn@...ray.eu>,
Pierre-Yves Kerbrat <pkerbrat@...ray.eu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] Revert "PCI: Fix is_added/is_busmaster race
condition"
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 01:24:51PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-08-17 at 10:44 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 02:48:57PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 44bda4b7d26e9fffed6d7152d98a2e9edaeb2a76.
> >
> > Just to be clear, if I understand correctly, this is a pure revert of
> > 44bda4b7d26e and as such it reintroduces the problem solved by that
> > commit.
> >
> > If your solution turns out to be better, that's great, but it would be
> > nice to avoid the bisection hole of reintroducing the problem, then
> > fixing it again later.
>
> There is no way to do that other than merging the revert and the fix
> into one. That said, the race is sufficiently hard to hit that I
> wouldn't worry too much about it.
OK, then at least mention that in the changelog.
> > > The new pci state mutex provides a simpler way of addressing
> > > this race and avoids the relative includes added to the powerpc
> > > code.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists