[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1534790251-15847-1-git-send-email-gengdongjiu@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 14:37:31 -0400
From: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>
To: <christoffer.dall@....com>, <marc.zyngier@....com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: rename the capability to set guest SError syndrome
In the documentation description, this capability's name is
KVM_CAP_ARM_SET_SERROR_ESR, but in the header file this
capability's name is KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_SERROR_ESR, so it
is better to use a same name.
Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>
---
In the Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt:
+8.19 KVM_CAP_ARM_SET_SERROR_ESR
In the include/uapi/linux/kvm.h:
+#define KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_SERROR_ESR 156
So in above two files, the capability's name is not same, it
is better to use a same name.
---
arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 2 +-
include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
index e37c78b..57dc6be 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ int kvm_arch_dev_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3:
r = kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3();
break;
- case KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_SERROR_ESR:
+ case KVM_CAP_ARM_SET_SERROR_ESR:
r = cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_RAS_EXTN);
break;
case KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG:
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
index 07548de..fab7525 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
@@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt {
#define KVM_CAP_HYPERV_TLBFLUSH 155
#define KVM_CAP_S390_HPAGE_1M 156
#define KVM_CAP_NESTED_STATE 157
-#define KVM_CAP_ARM_INJECT_SERROR_ESR 158
+#define KVM_CAP_ARM_SET_SERROR_ESR 158
#ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists