| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 10:49:38 +0000
From: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@...inx.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
CC: "richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
"absahu@...eaurora.org" <absahu@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"marek.vasut@...il.com" <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
"kyungmin.park@...sung.com" <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
"frieder.schrempf@...eet.de" <frieder.schrempf@...eet.de>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"miquel.raynal@...tlin.com" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
"nagasureshkumarrelli@...il.com" <nagasureshkumarrelli@...il.com>,
Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"peterpandong@...ron.com" <peterpandong@...ron.com>
Subject: RE: [LINUX PATCH v10 2/2] mtd: rawnand: arasan: Add support for
Arasan NAND Flash Controller
Hi Boris,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezillon@...tlin.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 2:24 PM
> To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@...inx.com>
> Cc: richard@....at; absahu@...eaurora.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> marek.vasut@...il.com; kyungmin.park@...sung.com; frieder.schrempf@...eet.de; linux-
> mtd@...ts.infradead.org; miquel.raynal@...tlin.com; nagasureshkumarrelli@...il.com;
> Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>; computersforpeace@...il.com; dwmw2@...radead.org;
> peterpandong@...ron.com
> Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v10 2/2] mtd: rawnand: arasan: Add support for Arasan
> NAND Flash Controller
>
> On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 05:49:32 +0000
> Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@...inx.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Boris,
> >
> > Thanks for the review.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezillon@...tlin.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 11:29 PM
> > > To: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@...inx.com>
> > > Cc: miquel.raynal@...tlin.com; richard@....at; dwmw2@...radead.org;
> > > computersforpeace@...il.com; marek.vasut@...il.com;
> > > kyungmin.park@...sung.com; absahu@...eaurora.org;
> > > peterpandong@...ron.com; frieder.schrempf@...eet.de; linux-
> > > mtd@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Michal Simek
> > > <michals@...inx.com>; nagasureshkumarrelli@...il.com
> > > Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH v10 2/2] mtd: rawnand: arasan: Add support
> > > for Arasan NAND Flash Controller
> > >
> > > Hi Naga,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 18:49:24 +0530
> > > Naga Sureshkumar Relli <naga.sureshkumar.relli@...inx.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +static int anfc_exec_op_cmd(struct nand_chip *chip,
> > > > + const struct nand_subop *subop) {
> > > > + const struct nand_op_instr *instr;
> > > > + struct anfc_op nfc_op = {};
> > > > + struct anfc_nand_chip *achip = to_anfc_nand(chip);
> > > > + struct anfc_nand_controller *nfc = to_anfc(chip->controller);
> > > > + struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
> > > > + u32 addrcycles;
> > > > + unsigned int op_id, len = 0;
> > > > + bool reading;
> > > > +
> > > > + anfc_parse_instructions(chip, subop, &nfc_op);
> > > > + instr = nfc_op.data_instr;
> > > > + op_id = nfc_op.data_instr_idx;
> > > > + if (nfc_op.data_instr)
> > > > + len = nand_subop_get_data_len(subop, op_id);
> > > > +
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * The switch case is to prepare a command and to set page/column
> > > > + * address. Arasan NAND controller has program register(Off: 0x10)),
> > > > + * which needs to be set for every command.
> > > > + * Ex: When NAND_CMD_RESET is issued, then we need to set reset bit
> > > > + * in program_register. etc..
> > > > + */
> > > > + switch (nfc_op.cmnds[0]) {
> > > > + case NAND_CMD_SEQIN:
> > > > + addrcycles = achip->raddr_cycles + achip->caddr_cycles;
> > > > +
> > > > + anfc_prepare_cmd(nfc, nfc_op.cmnds[0], NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG,
> 1,
> > > > + mtd->writesize, addrcycles);
> > > > + anfc_setpagecoladdr(nfc, nfc_op.row, nfc_op.col);
> > > > + break;
> > > > + case NAND_CMD_READOOB:
> > > > + nfc_op.col += mtd->writesize;
> > > > + case NAND_CMD_READ0:
> > > > + case NAND_CMD_READ1:
> > > > + addrcycles = achip->raddr_cycles + achip->caddr_cycles;
> > > > + anfc_prepare_cmd(nfc, NAND_CMD_READ0,
> NAND_CMD_READSTART,
> > > 1,
> > > > + mtd->writesize, addrcycles);
> > > > + anfc_setpagecoladdr(nfc, nfc_op.row, nfc_op.col);
> > > > + if (!nfc_op.data_instr)
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + anfc_read_data_op(mtd, instr->ctx.data.buf.in, len);
> > > > + break;
> > > > + case NAND_CMD_RNDOUT:
> > > > + anfc_prepare_cmd(nfc, nfc_op.cmnds[0],
> NAND_CMD_RNDOUTSTART, 1,
> > > > + mtd->writesize, 2);
> > > > + anfc_setpagecoladdr(nfc, nfc_op.row, nfc_op.col);
> > > > + nfc->prog = PROG_PGRD;
> > > > + break;
> > > > + case NAND_CMD_PARAM:
> > > > + anfc_prepare_cmd(nfc, nfc_op.cmnds[0], 0, 0, 0, 1);
> > > > + anfc_setpagecoladdr(nfc, nfc_op.row, nfc_op.col);
> > > > + nfc->prog = PROG_RDPARAM;
> > > > + break;
> > > > + case NAND_CMD_READID:
> > > > + anfc_prepare_cmd(nfc, nfc_op.cmnds[0], 0, 0, 0, 1);
> > > > + anfc_setpagecoladdr(nfc, nfc_op.row, nfc_op.col);
> > > > + nfc->prog = PROG_RDID;
> > > > + break;
> > > > + case NAND_CMD_GET_FEATURES:
> > > > + anfc_prepare_cmd(nfc, nfc_op.cmnds[0], 0, 0, 0, 1);
> > > > + anfc_setpagecoladdr(nfc, nfc_op.row, nfc_op.col);
> > > > + nfc->prog = PROG_GET_FEATURE;
> > > > + break;
> > > > + case NAND_CMD_SET_FEATURES:
> > > > + anfc_prepare_cmd(nfc, nfc_op.cmnds[0], 0, 0, 0, 1);
> > > > + anfc_setpagecoladdr(nfc, nfc_op.row, nfc_op.col);
> > > > + nfc->prog = PROG_SET_FEATURE;
> > > > + break;
> > > > + case NAND_CMD_ERASE1:
> > > > + anfc_erase_function(chip, nfc_op);
> > > > + break;
> > > > + default:
> > > > + break;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > Looks like you have one of these smart controllers where everything
> > > is hardcoded and new commands (like vendor specific commands) can't
> > > be supported, and we're back to abusing -
> > > >exec_op(), just like ->cmdfunc() was abused.
> > Actually hardcoding commands with ->exec_op() interface in the driver is really looking
> weird.
> > I agree with that.
> > But as per the spec, for every command, we need to set respective bit
> > in PROG_REG and because Of this, we need to track the commands for each exec_op() call.
> > >
> > > Don't you have a way to send raw CMD/ADDR/DATA cycles? If not, then
> > > we'll have to consider other options, because I don't want to go
> > > back to the situation we are in with -
> > > >cmdfunc().
> > As I said above, for each command we need to set a bit in PROG_REG, to initiate the
> operation.
> > The only conflicting thing is that, setting a respective bit in
> > PROG_REG based on the command Needs command tracking.
> > >
> > > Maybe I already asked, but is there a public spec for this IP?
> > I didn't find any public spec for this IP, but you can find the
> > register data base at below link
> > https://www.xilinx.com/html_docs/registers/ug1087/ug1087-zynq-ultrasca
> > le-registers.html
> > and click on NAND.
> > There we have Command Reg(Off: 0x0C) and Program Reg(Off: 0x10), which describes the
> usage.
> >
> > Also not in depth but at least something is documented in TRM
> > https://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/user_guides/ug1085-zynq-u
> > ltrascale-trm.pdf we can find the programming model in chapter 25.
> > Please let me know if I missed anything.
>
> I had a closer look at those documents (which I remember reading a while back BTW), and the
> PROG bits are indeed not described in detail.
>
> Still, I think it's close to what we have on Marvell SoC, where those 'modes' actually encode a
> specific sequence of timing that is used for well-known commands (like ERASE, RESET,
> READID) but could be used the same way with other opcodes assuming the sequence is the
> same.
>
> So, you should use the pattern approach, but not like you do: you should have a dedicated hook
> for each pattern which would set PROG bit, and then a generic helper to fill all other
> information (opcode, address cycles, ...).
Thanks for your suggestion and are you saying something like Marvell parser patterns for nfcv1 as below?
static const struct nand_op_parser marvell_nfcv1_op_parser = NAND_OP_PARSER(
/* Naked commands not supported, use a function for each pattern */
NAND_OP_PARSER_PATTERN(
marvell_nfc_read_id_type_exec,
NAND_OP_PARSER_PAT_CMD_ELEM(false),
NAND_OP_PARSER_PAT_ADDR_ELEM(false, MAX_ADDRESS_CYC_NFCV1),
NAND_OP_PARSER_PAT_DATA_IN_ELEM(false, 8)),
NAND_OP_PARSER_PATTERN(
marvell_nfc_erase_cmd_type_exec,
NAND_OP_PARSER_PAT_CMD_ELEM(false),
NAND_OP_PARSER_PAT_ADDR_ELEM(false, MAX_ADDRESS_CYC_NFCV1),
NAND_OP_PARSER_PAT_CMD_ELEM(false),
NAND_OP_PARSER_PAT_WAITRDY_ELEM(false)),
);
That means, a separate hook for each pattern, is that you are suggesting?
Thanks,
Naga Sureshkumar Relli.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists