linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Cleanup "fat: propagate 64-bit inode timestamps" patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3SVi2odjavRy-ktzcU2sMREVc+8EKxmDq3cv2nGeTeCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Aug 2018 14:39:09 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup "fat: propagate 64-bit inode timestamps" patch

On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 2:34 AM OGAWA Hirofumi
<hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Looks like I missed the email to read for a patch
> (mmots/broken-out/fat-propagate-64-bit-inode-timestamps.patch).  Well,
> so FWIW,
>
> Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
>
> And additionally cleanup patch here (this would be better to be folded
> into his patch).
>
> Thanks.
> --
> OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
>
> [PATCH] Cleanup "fat: propagate 64-bit inode timestamps" patch
>
> - Remove useless temporary variable
> - Remove needless long long
>
> Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

>  /* Linear day numbers of the respective 1sts in non-leap years. */
> -static time64_t days_in_year[] = {
> +static long days_in_year[] = {
>         /* Jan  Feb  Mar  Apr  May  Jun  Jul  Aug  Sep  Oct  Nov  Dec */
>         0,   0,  31,  59,  90, 120, 151, 181, 212, 243, 273, 304, 334, 0, 0, 0,
>  };

While this is correct, changing it back to a signed 'long' type seems
rather arbitrary. I tried to pick a type that would be the same on 32-bit
and 64-bit architectures, the other choice would have been 'u16',
which saves a few bytes.

A completely different approach would be to just use mktime()
and avoid reimplementing it.

     Arnd