linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 13/14] cpufreq: qcom: Re-organise kryo cpufreq to use it for other nvmem based qcom socs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Aug 2018 18:15:12 +0530
From:   Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     mark.rutland@....com, sudeep.holla@....com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
        ctatlor97@...il.com, rjw@...ysocki.net, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        sboyd@...eaurora.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        thierry.escande@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        david.brown@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, andy.gross@...aro.org,
        linux-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, niklas.cassel@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 13/14] cpufreq: qcom: Re-organise kryo cpufreq to use
 it for other nvmem based qcom socs

Hi Rob,

On 8/17/2018 8:39 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> Hi, this email is from Rob's (experimental) review bot. I found a couple
> of common problems with your patch. Please see below.
> 
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 17:42:32 +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
>> The kryo cpufreq driver reads the nvmem cell and uses that data to
>> populate the opps. There are other qcom cpufreq socs like krait which
>> does similar thing. Except for the interpretation of the read data,
>> rest of the driver is same for both the cases. So pull the common things
>> out for reuse.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
> 
> The preferred subject prefix is "dt-bindings: <binding dir>: ...".
> 

 ok, will change and keep the bindings update part out for this and the next
 patch.

Regards,
 Sricharan

-- 
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation