[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180820131703.jjib3ehmzs57dfni@mwanda>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 16:17:03 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Bhaskar Singh <bhaskar.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8188eu: Removed code valid for 5GHz
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 06:25:39PM +0530, Bhaskar Singh wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:50:43PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 01:17:29PM +0530, Bhaskar Singh wrote:
> > > This patch removed code which are valid for IEEE 802.11a i.e. 5GHz.
> >
> > I would be uncomfortable accepting this kind of change without an Ack
> > from the maintainers.
> >
> > The messes up the indenting so we can accept it anyway.
> >
> > regards,
> > dan carpenter
> >
>
> "find and remove remaining code valid only for 5 HGz. Most of the
> obvious ones have been removed, but things like channel > 14 still
> exist."
> With due respect, I want to say that, the above thing is mention on the
> TODO list, please correct if I intrepreted that statement wrongly.
>
Yeah. I think you interpreted it correctly. That seems fine then.
When I realized that we weren't going to merge the patch then I stopped
reviewing without looking at the TODO.
When you resend the patch, please quote all the relevant information
from the TODO so that we don't have to look for it:
This patch removes support for channels > 14. That is from the
TODO which says:
- find and remove remaining code valid only for 5 HGz. Most of
the obvious ones have been removed, but things like channel >
14 still exist.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists