[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D2852E34-BC10-4161-A05D-981E3A3D4098@amacapital.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 07:27:11 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Rian Hunter <rian@...m.mit.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/process: Export start_thread()
> On Aug 20, 2018, at 12:30 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2018, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Aug 19, 2018, at 4:08 PM, Rian Hunter <rian@...m.mit.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> Commit e634d8fc792c ("x86-64: merge the standard and compat
>>> start_thread() functions") removed exporting for the start_thread()
>>> function in what seems like a typo. Add it back to
>>> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c for parity with process_32.c and other
>>> arch.
>>
>> What for? Perhaps 32-bit could remove it instead?
>
> No. start_thread() is called from various binfmt implementations which can
> be built as modules.
Fair enough. I’m fine with the patch.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists