linux-kernel - Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: ti: Add Support for AM654 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180820143153.GD7523@atomide.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Aug 2018 07:31:53 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] arm64: dts: ti: Add Support for AM654 SoC

* Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com> [180808 06:35]:
> On Tuesday 05 June 2018 07:35 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Really need 64-bit addresses and sizes? Use ranges to limit the
> > address space if possible.
> 
> We now have address-cells as <1>,
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65.dtsi#n49
> 
> However each PCIe instance has 2 data regions and one of the regions
> (PCIE0_CORE_CORE_DAT_SLV_PCIE_DAT1/PCIE1_CORE_CORE_DAT_SLV_PCIE_DAT1 specified
> in the "MAIN Domain Memory Map" table of TRM http://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/spruid7)
> is above the 32bit region and requires 2 cells to specify the start address.
> This region is used to access MEM_SPACE of PCIe endpoint when operating in root
> complex mode and access memory of PCI root complex when operating in endpoint mode.
> 
> In order to describe this, should we change the address-cells back to <2> or do
> you suggest any other alternatives?

It's probably best to have the top level cbass interconnect use
#size-cells = <2> and then have it's child interconnects have
#size-cells = <1> if they don't need ranges above 4GB.

BTW, what's the difference between all these three similar PCIE
ranges?

PCIE0_CORE_CORE_DAT_SLV_PCIE_CORE 0x0005500000 0x0005600000 1 MB
PCIE1_CORE_CORE_DAT_SLV_PCIE_CORE 0x0005600000 0x0005700000 1 MB

PCIE0_CORE_CORE_DAT_SLV_PCIE_DAT0 0x0010000000 0x0018000000 128 MB
PCIE1_CORE_CORE_DAT_SLV_PCIE_DAT0 0x0018000000 0x0020000000 128 MB

PCIE0_CORE_CORE_DAT_SLV_PCIE_DAT1 0x4000000000 0x4100000000 4 GB
PCIE1_CORE_CORE_DAT_SLV_PCIE_DAT1 0x4100000000 0x4200000000 4 GB

Regards,

Tony