linux-kernel - [PATCH v9 2/4] Uprobes/sdt: Prevent multiple reference counter for same uprobe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180820044250.11659-3-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Aug 2018 10:12:48 +0530
From:   Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, oleg@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        mhiramat@...nel.org, liu.song.a23@...il.com
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
        namhyung@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, alexis.berlemont@...il.com,
        naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, ralf@...ux-mips.org, paul.burton@...s.com,
        Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 2/4] Uprobes/sdt: Prevent multiple reference counter for same uprobe

We assume to have only one reference counter for one uprobe.
Don't allow user to register multiple uprobes having same
inode+offset but different reference counter.

Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/events/uprobes.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 35065febcb6c..ecee371a59c7 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -679,6 +679,16 @@ static struct uprobe *insert_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
 	return u;
 }
 
+static void
+ref_ctr_mismatch_warn(struct uprobe *cur_uprobe, struct uprobe *uprobe)
+{
+	pr_warn("ref_ctr_offset mismatch. inode: 0x%lx offset: 0x%llx "
+		"ref_ctr_offset(old): 0x%llx ref_ctr_offset(new): 0x%llx\n",
+		uprobe->inode->i_ino, (unsigned long long) uprobe->offset,
+		(unsigned long long) cur_uprobe->ref_ctr_offset,
+		(unsigned long long) uprobe->ref_ctr_offset);
+}
+
 static struct uprobe *alloc_uprobe(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
 				   loff_t ref_ctr_offset)
 {
@@ -698,6 +708,12 @@ static struct uprobe *alloc_uprobe(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
 	cur_uprobe = insert_uprobe(uprobe);
 	/* a uprobe exists for this inode:offset combination */
 	if (cur_uprobe) {
+		if (cur_uprobe->ref_ctr_offset != uprobe->ref_ctr_offset) {
+			ref_ctr_mismatch_warn(cur_uprobe, uprobe);
+			put_uprobe(cur_uprobe);
+			kfree(uprobe);
+			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+		}
 		kfree(uprobe);
 		uprobe = cur_uprobe;
 	}
@@ -1112,6 +1128,9 @@ static int __uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
 	uprobe = alloc_uprobe(inode, offset, ref_ctr_offset);
 	if (!uprobe)
 		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (IS_ERR(uprobe))
+		return PTR_ERR(uprobe);
+
 	/*
 	 * We can race with uprobe_unregister()->delete_uprobe().
 	 * Check uprobe_is_active() and retry if it is false.
-- 
2.14.4