[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180820180503.GB23117@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:05:03 -0700
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@...il.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] powerpc: Use cpu_smallcore_sibling_mask at SMT
level on bigcores
* Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2018-08-20 11:11:44]:
> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Each of the SMT4 cores forming a big-core are more or less independent
> units. Thus when multiple tasks are scheduled to run on the fused
> core, we get the best performance when the tasks are spread across the
> pair of SMT4 cores.
>
> This patch achieves this by setting the SMT level mask to correspond
> to the smallcore sibling mask on big-core systems. This patch also
> ensures that while checked for shared-caches on big-core system, we
> use the smallcore_sibling_mask to compare with the l2_cache_mask.
> This ensure that the CACHE level sched-domain is created, whose groups
> correspond to the threads of the big-core.
>
> With this patch, the SMT sched-domain with SMT=8,4,2 on big-core
> systems are as follows:
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists