lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:34:17 -0700
From:   Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>
To:     Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc:     Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] kbuild: Allow asm-specific compiler_types.h

Hi Masahiro,

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 02:04:24PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2018-08-19 3:10 GMT+09:00 Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>:
> > We have a need to override the definition of
> > barrier_before_unreachable() for MIPS, which means we either need to add
> > architecture-specific code into linux/compiler-gcc.h or we need to allow
> > the architecture to provide a header that can define the macro before
> > the generic definition. The latter seems like the better approach.
> >
> > A straightforward approach to the per-arch header is to make use of
> > asm-generic to provide a default empty header & adjust architectures
> > which don't need anything specific to make use of that by adding the
> > header to generic-y. Unfortunately this doesn't work so well due to
> > commit a95b37e20db9 ("kbuild: get <linux/compiler_types.h> out of
> > <linux/kconfig.h>") which moved the inclusion of linux/compiler.h to
> > cflags using the -include compiler flag.
> >
> > Because the -include flag is present for all C files we compile, we need
> > the architecture-provided header to be present before any C files are
> > compiled. If any C files can be compiled prior to the asm-generic header
> > wrappers being generated then we hit a build failure due to missing
> > header. Such cases do exist - one pointed out by the kbuild test robot
> > is the compilation of arch/ia64/kernel/nr-irqs.c, which occurs as part
> > of the archprepare target [1].
> >
> > This leaves us with a few options:
> >
> >   1) Use generic-y & fix any build failures we find by enforcing
> >      ordering such that the asm-generic target occurs before any C
> >      compilation, such that linux/compiler_types.h can always include
> >      the generated asm-generic wrapper which in turn includes the empty
> >      asm-generic header. This would rely on us finding all the
> >      problematic cases - I don't know for sure that the ia64 issue is
> >      the only one.
> >
> >   2) Add an actual empty header to each architecture, so that we don't
> >      need the generated asm-generic wrapper. This seems messy.
> >
> >   3) Give up & add #ifdef CONFIG_MIPS or similar to
> >      linux/compiler_types.h. This seems messy too.
> >
> >   4) Include the arch header only when it's actually needed, removing
> >      the need for the asm-generic wrapper for all other architectures.
> >
> > This patch allows us to use approach 4, by including an
> > asm/compiler_types.h header using the -include flag in the same way we
> > do for linux/compiler_types.h, but only if the header actually exists.
> 
> I agree with the approach 4),
> but I am of two minds about how to implement it.
> 
> I guess the cost of evaluating 'wildcard' for each C file
> is unnoticeable level, but I am slightly in favor of
> including <asm/compilr_types.h> from <linux/compiler_types.h>
> conditionally.
> 
> I am not sure about the CONFIG name, but for example, like this.
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_COMPILER_TYPES
> #include <asm/compiler_types.h>
> #endif
> 
> What do you think?

That sounds fine to me - I'll submit a v9 shortly :)

Thanks,
    Paul

Powered by blists - more mailing lists