[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1534749606-7311-3-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 15:20:06 +0800
From: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>
To: axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: tom.leiming@...il.com, bart.vanassche@....com,
keith.busch@...ux.intel.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 2/2] blk-mq: sync the update nr_hw_queues with blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter
For blk-mq, part_in_flight/rw will invoke blk_mq_in_flight/rw to
account the inflight requests. It will access the queue_hw_ctx and
nr_hw_queues w/o any protection. When updating nr_hw_queues and
blk_mq_in_flight/rw occur concurrently, panic comes up.
Before update nr_hw_queues, the q will be frozen. So we could use
q_usage_counter to avoid the race. percpu_ref_is_zero is used here
so that we will not miss any in-flight request. The access to
nr_hw_queues and queue_hw_ctx in blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter are
under rcu critical section, __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues could use
synchronize_rcu to ensure the zeroed q_usage_counter to be globally
visible.
Signed-off-by: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>
---
block/blk-mq-tag.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
block/blk-mq.c | 5 ++++-
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
index c0c4e63..8c5cc11 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
@@ -320,6 +320,18 @@ void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct request_queue *q, busy_iter_fn *fn,
struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
int i;
+ /*
+ * __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues will update the nr_hw_queues and
+ * queue_hw_ctx after freeze the queue. So we could use q_usage_counter
+ * to avoid race with it. __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues will users
+ * synchronize_rcu to ensure all of the users go out of the critical
+ * section below and see zeroed q_usage_counter.
+ */
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ if (percpu_ref_is_zero(&q->q_usage_counter)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return;
+ }
queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
struct blk_mq_tags *tags = hctx->tags;
@@ -335,7 +347,7 @@ void blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter(struct request_queue *q, busy_iter_fn *fn,
bt_for_each(hctx, &tags->breserved_tags, fn, priv, true);
bt_for_each(hctx, &tags->bitmap_tags, fn, priv, false);
}
-
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
static int bt_alloc(struct sbitmap_queue *bt, unsigned int depth,
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 7b99477..fb56bae 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2905,7 +2905,10 @@ static void __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list)
blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
-
+ /*
+ * Sync with blk_mq_in_flight and blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter.
+ */
+ synchronize_rcu();
/*
* switch io scheduler to NULL to clean up the data in it.
* will get it back after update mapping between cpu and hw queues.
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists