lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 01:59:08 +0000 From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> CC: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH] usb: hide usb_of_get_companion_dev for CONFIG_USB=n Hi Arnd, > From: Arnd Bergmann, Sent: Monday, August 20, 2018 8:22 PM > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 5:22 AM Yoshihiro Shimoda > <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com> wrote: > > > From: Arnd Bergmann, Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 11:27 PM > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 3:58 PM Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 13 Aug 2018, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > > > > > index 0a16cbd4e528..663a8bd67a7b 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > > > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/Kconfig > > > > > @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ config USB_RENESAS_USB3 > > > > > tristate 'Renesas USB3.0 Peripheral controller' > > > > > depends on ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST > > > > > depends on EXTCON > > > > > + depends on USB || !USB > > > > > > > > Is this some weird standard idiom? It looks really strange. > > > > > > Yes, and yes. > > > > > > A less common way to write it is > > > > > > depends on (USB != m) || m > > > > > > which some people prefer, but I find even weirder. > > > > Thank you for the patch! > > > > On other thread, John mentions gadget-side drivers should not depend on host-side [1]. > > So, I submitted a patch today [2]. What do you think about my submitted patch? > > > > [1] > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=153433776202861&w=2 > > I don't really think this is a big issue, as you can still build the driver > with CONFIG_USB=n, so it's not a strict dependency. I got it. > > [2] > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10569847/ > > On the other hand, your patch looks nice and is somewhat > less confusing, so you have my Ack on that. Thank you very much for your Ack! I'll reply by myself to record your Ack on that. Best regards, Yoshihiro Shimoda > Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists