linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: add QorIQ LX2160A SoC support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180821101652.GA18139@e107155-lin>
Date:   Tue, 21 Aug 2018 11:17:02 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Vabhav Sharma <vabhav.sharma@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
        sboyd@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
        will.deacon@....com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, arnd@...db.de,
        kstewart@...uxfoundation.org, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, V.Sethi@....com, udit.kumar@....com,
        Ramneek Mehresh <ramneek.mehresh@....com>,
        Zhang Ying-22455 <ying.zhang22455@....com>,
        Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@....com>,
        Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@....com>,
        Yogesh Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com>,
        Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@....com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: add QorIQ LX2160A SoC support

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 12:17:15PM +0530, Vabhav Sharma wrote:
> LX2160A SoC is based on Layerscape Chassis Generation 3.2 Architecture.
> 
> LX2160A features an advanced 16 64-bit ARM v8 CortexA72 processor cores
> in 8 cluster, CCN508, GICv3,two 64-bit DDR4 memory controller, 8 I2C
> controllers, 3 dspi, 2 esdhc,2 USB 3.0, mmu 500, 3 SATA, 4 PL011 SBSA
> UARTs etc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ramneek Mehresh <ramneek.mehresh@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Ying-22455 <ying.zhang22455@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Yogesh Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Vabhav Sharma <vabhav.sharma@....com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi | 572 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 572 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e35e494
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,572 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
> +//
> +// Device Tree Include file for Layerscape-LX2160A family SoC.
> +//
> +// Copyright 2018 NXP
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +
> +/memreserve/ 0x80000000 0x00010000;
> +
> +/ {
> +	compatible = "fsl,lx2160a";
> +	interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> +	#address-cells = <2>;
> +	#size-cells = <2>;
> +
> +	cpus {
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +		// 8 clusters having 2 Cortex-A72 cores each
> +		cpu@0 {
> +			device_type = "cpu";
> +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a72";
> +			reg = <0x0>;
> +			clocks = <&clockgen 1 0>;
> +			next-level-cache = <&cluster0_l2>;

If you expect to get cache properties in sysfs entries, you need to populate
them here and for each L2 cache.

[...]

> +
> +	rstcr: syscon@...0000 {
> +		compatible = "syscon";
> +		reg = <0x0 0x1e60000 0x0 0x4>;
> +	};
> +
> +	reboot {
> +		compatible ="syscon-reboot";
> +		regmap = <&rstcr>;
> +		offset = <0x0>;
> +		mask = <0x2>;

Is this disabled in bootloader ? With PSCI, it's preferred to use
SYSTEM_RESET/OFF. EL3 f/w may need to do some housekeeping on poweroff.

> +	};
> +
> +	timer {
> +		compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> +		interrupts = <1 13 4>, // Physical Secure PPI, active-low

The comment says active low but the value 4 indicates it's HIGH from
"include/dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h"

> +			     <1 14 4>, // Physical Non-Secure PPI, active-low
> +			     <1 11 4>, // Virtual PPI, active-low
> +			     <1 10 4>; // Hypervisor PPI, active-low
> +	};
> +
> +	pmu {
> +		compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3";

More specific compatible preferably "arm,cortex-a72-pmu" ?

--
Regards,
Sudeep