[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180821104418.12710-7-david@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:44:18 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFCv2 6/6] memory-hotplug.txt: Add some details about locking internals
Let's document the magic a bit, especially why device_hotplug_lock is
required when adding/removing memory and how it all play together with
requests to online/offline memory from user space.
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt b/Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt
index 7f49ebf3ddb2..03aaad7d7373 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Memory Hotplug
==============
:Created: Jul 28 2007
-:Updated: Add description of notifier of memory hotplug: Oct 11 2007
+:Updated: Add some details about locking internals: Aug 20 2018
This document is about memory hotplug including how-to-use and current status.
Because Memory Hotplug is still under development, contents of this text will
@@ -495,6 +495,43 @@ further processing of the notification queue.
NOTIFY_STOP stops further processing of the notification queue.
+
+Locking Internals
+=================
+
+When adding/removing memory that uses memory block devices (i.e. ordinary RAM),
+the device_hotplug_lock should be held to:
+
+- synchronize against online/offline requests (e.g. via sysfs). This way, memory
+ block devices can only be accessed (.online/.state attributes) by user
+ space once memory has been fully added. And when removing memory, we
+ know nobody is in critical sections.
+- synchronize against CPU hotplug and similar (e.g. relevant for ACPI and PPC)
+
+Especially, there is a possible lock inversion that is avoided using
+device_hotplug_lock when adding memory and user space tries to online that
+memory faster than expected:
+
+- device_online() will first take the device_lock(), followed by
+ mem_hotplug_lock
+- add_memory_resource() will first take the mem_hotplug_lock, followed by
+ the device_lock() (while creating the devices, during bus_add_device()).
+
+As the device is visible to user space before taking the device_lock(), this
+can result in a lock inversion.
+
+onlining/offlining of memory should be done via device_online()/
+device_offline() - to make sure it is properly synchronized to actions
+via sysfs. Holding device_hotplug_lock is advised (to e.g. protect online_type)
+
+When adding/removing/onlining/offlining memory or adding/removing
+heterogeneous/device memory, we should always hold the mem_hotplug_lock to
+serialise memory hotplug (e.g. access to global/zone variables).
+
+In addition, mem_hotplug_lock (in contrast to device_hotplug_lock) allows
+for a quite efficient get_online_mems/put_online_mems implementation.
+
+
Future Work
===========
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists