[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c4f99d0-0ac0-59f4-8793-2eeb47e975e8@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 11:22:06 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
syzbot <syzbot+1f56df64bfb3c29dde6f@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: dvhart@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: general protection fault in finish_task_switch (2)
On 22/08/2018 11:08, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=10023961400000
>
>> RIP: 0010:__fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers kernel/sched/core.c:2481
> That repro thing does something dodgy with KVM, which then corrupts the
> premption notifier thing. I'm sufficiently KVM clueless to not really
> know where to start looking though..
It seems to be a reference counting issue, or something like that. I'm
looking at it...
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists