lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d221236-636e-962e-2e4e-3db228689c5e@cogentembedded.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Aug 2018 12:34:30 +0300
From:   Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:     Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] ata: ahci-platform: add reset control support and
 the flag to specify using reset

Hello!

On 8/22/2018 10:36 AM, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:

> Add support to get and control a list of resets for the device
> as optional and shared. These resets must be kept de-asserted until
> the device is enabled.
> 
> This is specified as shared because some SoCs like UniPhier series
> have common reset controls with all ahci controller instances.
> 
> However, according to Thierry's view,
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg55357.html
> some hardware-specific drivers already use their own resets,
> and the common reset make a path to occur double controls of resets.
> 
> Now this add the flag to ahci_platform_get_resources() indicating
> whether to use the resources, currently resets only, and existing
> drivers set 0 to this flags.
> 
> Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>
[...]

> diff --git a/include/linux/ahci_platform.h b/include/linux/ahci_platform.h
> index 1b0a17b..eaedca5f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ahci_platform.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ahci_platform.h
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ void ahci_platform_disable_regulators(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv);
>   int ahci_platform_enable_resources(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv);
>   void ahci_platform_disable_resources(struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv);
>   struct ahci_host_priv *ahci_platform_get_resources(
> -	struct platform_device *pdev);
> +	struct platform_device *pdev, unsigned int flags);

    That breaks all the users of this API. You should fix the callers in this 
same patch to avoid breakage.

[...]

MBR, Sergei

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ