[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae663623-6af5-9c53-0e4b-f48b9c517a46@synopsys.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 10:45:46 +0100
From: Gustavo Pimentel <Gustavo.Pimentel@...opsys.com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC: "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: dwc: fix scheduling while atomic issues
Hi Jisheng
On 21/08/2018 07:15, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> When programming inbound/outbound atu, we call usleep_range() after
> each checking PCIE_ATU_ENABLE bit. Unfortunately, the atu programming
> can be called in atomic context:
>
> inbound atu programming could be called through
> pci_epc_write_header()
> =>dw_pcie_ep_write_header()
> =>dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu()
>
> outbound atu programming could be called through
> pci_bus_read_config_dword()
> =>dw_pcie_rd_conf()
> =>dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu()
>
> Fix this issue by calling mdelay() instead.
Makes sense. Thanks.
Acked-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>
Regards,
Gustavo
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
> ---
>
> Since v1
> - use mdelay() instead of udelay() to avoid __bad_udelay()
>
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 3 +--
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> index 778c4f76a884..2153956a0b20 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index,
> if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE)
> return;
>
> - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX);
> + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU);
> }
> dev_err(pci->dev, "Outbound iATU is not being enabled\n");
> }
> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int type,
> if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE)
> return;
>
> - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX);
> + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU);
> }
> dev_err(pci->dev, "Outbound iATU is not being enabled\n");
> }
> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index,
> if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE)
> return 0;
>
> - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX);
> + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU);
> }
> dev_err(pci->dev, "Inbound iATU is not being enabled\n");
>
> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int bar,
> if (val & PCIE_ATU_ENABLE)
> return 0;
>
> - usleep_range(LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN, LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX);
> + mdelay(LINK_WAIT_IATU);
> }
> dev_err(pci->dev, "Inbound iATU is not being enabled\n");
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> index 96126fd8403c..9f1a5e399b70 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -26,8 +26,7 @@
>
> /* Parameters for the waiting for iATU enabled routine */
> #define LINK_WAIT_MAX_IATU_RETRIES 5
> -#define LINK_WAIT_IATU_MIN 9000
> -#define LINK_WAIT_IATU_MAX 10000
> +#define LINK_WAIT_IATU 9
>
> /* Synopsys-specific PCIe configuration registers */
> #define PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL 0x710
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists