linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 00/22] LSM: Full security module stacking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1808221958170.29682@namei.org>
Date:   Wed, 22 Aug 2018 19:59:19 +1000 (AEST)
From:   James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:     Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
cc:     Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@...tonmail.ch>,
        Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>,
        LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKLM <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
        SE Linux <selinux@...ho.nsa.gov>,
        "SMACK-discuss@...ts.01.org" <SMACK-discuss@...ts.01.org>,
        John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        "Schaufler, Casey" <casey.schaufler@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/22] LSM: Full security module stacking

On Tue, 14 Aug 2018, Casey Schaufler wrote:

> On 8/14/2018 4:22 PM, Jordan Glover wrote:
> > On August 14, 2018 8:28 PM, Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
> >
> > On the other hand there is concern that those security modules might
> > be abandoned if they have to wait until everything is finished :)
> 
> There is some truth to that. If we can get commitment from the developers
> of those security module to push for getting upstream, a statement of
> intent to support additional modules (e.g. Landlock, S.A.R.A.) from a
> significant distribution (e.g. Fedora, Ubuntu, SuSE) and ACKs from the
> maintainers of the existing modules we should be able to breeze right in.
> 

Sounds reasonable. Please focus on what's needed for Landlock and SARA.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>