[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9d0681f2-9c14-dd6f-94e9-e677b7702207@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 13:13:10 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: store DXC/VXC in fpc on
DATA/Vector-processing exceptions
On 22.08.2018 12:31, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 22.08.2018 11:53, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> When DATA exceptions and vector-processing exceptions (program interrupts)
>> are injected, the DXC/VXC is also to be stored in the fpc, if AFP is
>> enabled in CR0.
>>
>> This can happen inside KVM when reinjecting an interrupt during program
>> interrupt intercepts. These are triggered for example when debugging the
>> guest (concurrent PER events result in an intercept instead of an
>> injection of such interrupts).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Only compile-tested.
>
> It baffles me that AFP is still a thing in zArch mode. I would have
> expected it to be a default 1. But then again, I just found out about it.
>
> POP checks out:
> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
>
>
>>
>> arch/s390/include/asm/ctl_reg.h | 1 +
>> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/ctl_reg.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/ctl_reg.h
>> index 4600453536c2..88f3f14baee9 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/ctl_reg.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/ctl_reg.h
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>> #include <linux/const.h>
>>
>> #define CR0_CLOCK_COMPARATOR_SIGN _BITUL(63 - 10)
>> +#define CR0_AFP_REGISTER_CONTROL _BITUL(63 - 45)
>> #define CR0_EMERGENCY_SIGNAL_SUBMASK _BITUL(63 - 49)
>> #define CR0_EXTERNAL_CALL_SUBMASK _BITUL(63 - 50)
>> #define CR0_CLOCK_COMPARATOR_SUBMASK _BITUL(63 - 52)
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> index fcb55b02990e..5b5754d8f460 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> @@ -765,6 +765,14 @@ static int __must_check __deliver_prog(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> break;
>> case PGM_VECTOR_PROCESSING:
>> case PGM_DATA:
>> + if (vcpu->arch.sie_block->gcr[0] & CR0_AFP_REGISTER_CONTROL) {
>> + /* make sure the new fpc will be lazily loaded */
>> + save_fpu_regs();
>> + /* the DXC/VXC cannot make the fpc invalid */
>> + current->thread.fpu.fpc &= ~0xff00u;
>> + current->thread.fpu.fpc |= (pgm_info.data_exc_code << 8)
>> + & 0xff00u;
>
> Everything except that byte should be 0 anyway when it comes from
> lowcore, why do you mask?
User space can inject such an interrupt and could therefore set reserved
bits, leading to a crash (fpc invalid when loaded). E.g. via
kvm_s390_set_irq_state().
As of now, DXC/VXC is always 1byte. The other ones are to be stored as
0. (what we expect to always hold for now but user space can do crazy
things)
Thanks!
>
>> + }
>> rc = put_guest_lc(vcpu, pgm_info.data_exc_code,
>> (u32 *)__LC_DATA_EXC_CODE);
>> break;
>>
>
>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists