linux-kernel - Re: bisected - arm64 kvm unit test failures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:57:26 +0200
From:   Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: bisected - arm64 kvm unit test failures

On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 14:50 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 22/08/18 14:38, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 16:34 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> Could you give that patchlet[1] a go? It solves a similar issue for me
> >> on a different platform.
> >>
> >> [1] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/kvmarm/2018-August/032469.html
> > 
> > Yup, all better.
> 
> Now I'm not sure it actually fixes anything. Alex's test case seem to
> have opened a new can of worms... In tracing hell at the moment.

I'll keep the test box reserved a while longer.  When you get it's
other leg stuffed into the casket, if you want testing, holler.

	-Mike