linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: s390: vsie: Do the CRYCB validation first

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e985a036-1b19-0feb-e50c-d55dec3dc9e7@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Aug 2018 19:15:49 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cohuck@...hat.com,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        frankja@...ux.ibm.com, akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: s390: vsie: Do the CRYCB validation first

On 22.08.2018 18:51, Pierre Morel wrote:
> When entering the SIE the CRYCB validation better
> be done independently of the instruction's
> availability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> index 7ee4329..fca25aa 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> @@ -164,17 +164,18 @@ static int shadow_crycb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
>  	/* format-1 is supported with message-security-assist extension 3 */
>  	if (!test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 76))
>  		return 0;
> -	/* we may only allow it if enabled for guest 2 */
> -	ecb3_flags = scb_o->ecb3 & vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb3 &
> -		     (ECB3_AES | ECB3_DEA);
> -	if (!ecb3_flags)
> -		return 0;
>  
>  	if ((crycb_addr & PAGE_MASK) != ((crycb_addr + 128) & PAGE_MASK))
>  		return set_validity_icpt(scb_s, 0x003CU);
>  	if (!crycb_addr)
>  		return set_validity_icpt(scb_s, 0x0039U);
>  
> +	/* we may only allow it if enabled for guest 2 */
> +	ecb3_flags = scb_o->ecb3 & vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb3 &
> +		     (ECB3_AES | ECB3_DEA);
> +	if (!ecb3_flags)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	/* copy only the wrapping keys */
>  	if (read_guest_real(vcpu, crycb_addr + 72,
>  			    vsie_page->crycb.dea_wrapping_key_mask, 56))
> 

That makes sense, especially if ECB3_AES is used but effectively turned
off by us.

What is the expected behavior if ECB3_AES | ECB3_DEA are not set by g2
for g3?

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb