linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/mm/tlb: Revert the recent lazy TLB patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFw6bBFnV__JZnzh0ZCSTma5J2ijH8BnMtfK55dnjVp=dw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Aug 2018 14:37:05 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Adin Scannell <ascannell@...gle.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86/mm/tlb: Revert the recent lazy TLB patches

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 8:46 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> Revert [..] in order to simplify the TLB invalidate fixes for x86. We'll try again later.

Rik, I assume I should take your earlier "yeah, I can try later" as an
ack for this?

I'll wait a bit more in the hopes of getting reviews/acks, but I'm
basically chomping at the bit to just apply this series and have this
issue behind us.

             Linus