linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] apparmor: remove unused label

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <87zhxdrvq7.fsf@morokweng.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 23 Aug 2018 11:41:36 -0300
From:   Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Seth Arnold <seth.arnold@...onical.com>,
        Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] apparmor: remove unused label


Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:

> After the corresponding 'goto' was removed, we get a warning
> for the 'fail' label:
>
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c: In function 'unpack_dfa':
> security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c:426:1: error: label 'fail' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-label]
>
> Fixes: fb5841091f28 ("apparmor: remove no-op permission check in policy_unpack")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
>  security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c
> index 3647b5834ace..96d8cf68ce65 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c
> @@ -423,7 +423,6 @@ static struct aa_dfa *unpack_dfa(struct aa_ext *e)
>
>  	return dfa;
>
> -fail:
>  	aa_put_dfa(dfa);
>  	return ERR_PTR(-EPROTO);
>  }

Shouldn't the two lines after the label be removed as well? IIUC they're
unreachable now.

--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center