linux-kernel - Re: Kernel-only deployments?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180823203938.GW4225@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:39:38 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc:     Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel-only deployments?

On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 12:16:04PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 08:54:17PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:43:59AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > The mkinitramfs approach results in about 40MB of initrd, and dracut
> > > about 10MB.  Most of this is completely useless for rcutorture, which
> > > isn't interested in mounting filesystems, opening devices, and almost
> > > all of the other interesting things that mkinitramfs and dracut enable.
> > > 
> > > Those who know me will not be at all surprised to learn that I went
> > > overboard making the resulting initrd as small as possible.  I started
> > > by throwing out everything not absolutely needed by the dash and sleep
> > > binaries, which got me down to about 2.5MB, 1.8MB of which was libc.
> > > This situation of course prompted me to create an initrd containing
> > > a statically linked binary named "init" and absolutely nothing else
> > > (not even /dev or /tmp directories), which weighs in at not quite 800KB.
> > > This is a great improvement over 10MB, to say nothing of 40MB, but 800KB
> > > for a C-language "for" loop containing nothing more than a single call to
> > > sleep()?
> > 
> > .globl _start
> > .data
> > req:    .8byte 999999999, 999999999
> > .text
> > _start:
> >         mov     $35, %rax       # syscall: nanosleep
> >         mov     $req, %rdi
> >         xor     %rsi, %rsi
> >         syscall
> >         jmp     _start
> > 
> > 
> > as sl.s -o sl.o
> > ld sl.o -o init
> > 
> > 'Ere you go, no libc needed.  If your arch is not amd64, just say so.
> 
> "pause" ($34) would also suffice, and would not require an argument or a
> .data section.

Cute!  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul