[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7e154505-5f73-1054-e67e-cdfb249fec43@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 18:07:34 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: "Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi, lucas.de.marchi@...il.com,
michal.lkml@...kovi.net, jeyu@...nel.org, cwhuang@...ux.org.tw,
"3.8+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Discussions about the Letux Kernel
<letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: please revert commit ce8556cca6 "kbuild: verify that $DEPMOD is
installed" introduced in v4.18.4.
On 08/22/2018 05:39 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 4:35 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 08/22/2018 11:53 AM, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>> This patch requires that /sbin/depmod is installed and installable on
>>> the build host.
>>>
>>> But not all build hosts for cross compiling Linux are Linux systems
>>> and are able to provide a working port of depmod, especially at the
>>> file patch /sbin/depmod.
>>>
>>> I use, for example, a Darwin system to cross compile Linux and I run
>>> depmod -a on the embedded system once, after installing a new Linux
>>> kernel there.
>>>
>>> I have no problem with seeing a warning, but aborting the build process
>>> is IMHO a bad idea since the previous behaviour didn't harm many people
>>> as far as I see. Probably 99% of people compiling Linux kernels do that
>>> on Linux and 99% of those have depmod installed for optimal operation of
>>> their build host. So IMHO printing the warning is good enough.
>>
>> Thanks for the report and sorry about the problem.
>>
>> I'm OK with changing the error to a warning.
>> Does the patch below work for you?
>
> Why would one want a warning on a host that never runs "make modules_install"?
> Can this check be only done when we actually try to install modules?
So Nikolaus: how do you provoke this problem that you are reporting?
It's not just a theoretical problem, is it?
The way that I read the top-level Makefile, this check for $DEPMOD only happens
when you run "make modules_install".
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists