linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: s390: vsie: BUG correction by shadow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:08:47 +0200
From:   Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cohuck@...hat.com,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
        schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: s390: vsie: BUG correction by shadow_crycb

On 23/08/2018 10:02, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 22.08.2018 18:53, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 22.08.2018 18:51, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>> Copy the key mask to the right offset inside the shadow CRYCB
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@...ux.ibm.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c | 3 ++-
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
>>> index 9175518..12b9707 100644
>>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
>>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
>>> @@ -173,7 +173,8 @@ static int shadow_crycb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vsie_page *vsie_page)
>>>   		return set_validity_icpt(scb_s, 0x0039U);
>>>   
>>>   	/* copy only the wrapping keys */
>>> -	if (read_guest_real(vcpu, crycb_addr + 72, &vsie_page->crycb, 56))
>>> +	if (read_guest_real(vcpu, crycb_addr + 72,
>>> +			    vsie_page->crycb.dea_wrapping_key_mask, 56))
>>>   		return set_validity_icpt(scb_s, 0x0035U);
>>>   
>>>   	scb_s->ecb3 |= ecb3_flags;
>>>
>>
>> Please fixup the subject as requested. (were there more RB-s?)
>>
> 
> Yes, he seems to have ignored mine...
> 
Sorry,
I focused on your comment and the answer from David and forgot it.

thanks Janosch I will add it of course

regards,
Pierre

-- 
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany