linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 057/130] md/raid10: fix that replacement cannot complete recovery after reassemble

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180823074930.885484074@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:52:53 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Alex Chen <alexchen@...ology.com>,
        Alex Wu <alexwu@...ology.com>,
        Chung-Chiang Cheng <cccheng@...ology.com>,
        BingJing Chang <bingjingc@...ology.com>,
        Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 057/130] md/raid10: fix that replacement cannot complete recovery after reassemble

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: BingJing Chang <bingjingc@...ology.com>

[ Upstream commit bda3153998f3eb2cafa4a6311971143628eacdbc ]

During assemble, the spare marked for replacement is not checked.
conf->fullsync cannot be updated to be 1. As a result, recovery will
treat it as a clean array. All recovering sectors are skipped. Original
device is replaced with the not-recovered spare.

mdadm -C /dev/md0 -l10 -n4 -pn2 /dev/loop[0123]
mdadm /dev/md0 -a /dev/loop4
mdadm /dev/md0 --replace /dev/loop0
mdadm -S /dev/md0 # stop array during recovery

mdadm -A /dev/md0 /dev/loop[01234]

After reassemble, you can see recovery go on, but it completes
immediately. In fact, recovery is not actually processed.

To solve this problem, we just add the missing logics for replacment
spares. (In raid1.c or raid5.c, they have already been checked.)

Reported-by: Alex Chen <alexchen@...ology.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Wu <alexwu@...ology.com>
Reviewed-by: Chung-Chiang Cheng <cccheng@...ology.com>
Signed-off-by: BingJing Chang <bingjingc@...ology.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/md/raid10.c |    7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
@@ -3734,6 +3734,13 @@ static int raid10_run(struct mddev *mdde
 			    disk->rdev->saved_raid_disk < 0)
 				conf->fullsync = 1;
 		}
+
+		if (disk->replacement &&
+		    !test_bit(In_sync, &disk->replacement->flags) &&
+		    disk->replacement->saved_raid_disk < 0) {
+			conf->fullsync = 1;
+		}
+
 		disk->recovery_disabled = mddev->recovery_disabled - 1;
 	}