linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 089/130] ieee802154: at86rf230: use __func_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180823074932.960899583@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:53:25 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 089/130] ieee802154: at86rf230: use __func__ macro for debug messages

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>

[ Upstream commit 8a81388ec27c4c0adbdecd20e67bb5f411ab46b2 ]

Instead of having the function name hard-coded (it might change and we
forgot to update them in the debug output) we can use __func__ instead
and also shorter the line so we do not need to break it. Also fix an
extra blank line while being here.
Found by checkpatch.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c |   13 ++++---------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c
@@ -1117,8 +1117,7 @@ at86rf230_set_hw_addr_filt(struct ieee80
 	if (changed & IEEE802154_AFILT_SADDR_CHANGED) {
 		u16 addr = le16_to_cpu(filt->short_addr);
 
-		dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev,
-			 "at86rf230_set_hw_addr_filt called for saddr\n");
+		dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev, "%s called for saddr\n", __func__);
 		__at86rf230_write(lp, RG_SHORT_ADDR_0, addr);
 		__at86rf230_write(lp, RG_SHORT_ADDR_1, addr >> 8);
 	}
@@ -1126,8 +1125,7 @@ at86rf230_set_hw_addr_filt(struct ieee80
 	if (changed & IEEE802154_AFILT_PANID_CHANGED) {
 		u16 pan = le16_to_cpu(filt->pan_id);
 
-		dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev,
-			 "at86rf230_set_hw_addr_filt called for pan id\n");
+		dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev, "%s called for pan id\n", __func__);
 		__at86rf230_write(lp, RG_PAN_ID_0, pan);
 		__at86rf230_write(lp, RG_PAN_ID_1, pan >> 8);
 	}
@@ -1136,15 +1134,13 @@ at86rf230_set_hw_addr_filt(struct ieee80
 		u8 i, addr[8];
 
 		memcpy(addr, &filt->ieee_addr, 8);
-		dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev,
-			 "at86rf230_set_hw_addr_filt called for IEEE addr\n");
+		dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev, "%s called for IEEE addr\n", __func__);
 		for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
 			__at86rf230_write(lp, RG_IEEE_ADDR_0 + i, addr[i]);
 	}
 
 	if (changed & IEEE802154_AFILT_PANC_CHANGED) {
-		dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev,
-			 "at86rf230_set_hw_addr_filt called for panc change\n");
+		dev_vdbg(&lp->spi->dev, "%s called for panc change\n", __func__);
 		if (filt->pan_coord)
 			at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_AACK_I_AM_COORD, 1);
 		else
@@ -1248,7 +1244,6 @@ at86rf230_set_cca_mode(struct ieee802154
 	return at86rf230_write_subreg(lp, SR_CCA_MODE, val);
 }
 
-
 static int
 at86rf230_set_cca_ed_level(struct ieee802154_hw *hw, s32 mbm)
 {