[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwMu2cN44WL7hK-xZmHUcSiifYkADTzFnQBO1jmJpZhmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 20:44:05 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Adin Scannell <ascannell@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/tlb: Remove tlb_remove_table() non-concurrent condition
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 8:35 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> No. Because mm_users doesn't contain any lazy tlb users.
.. or, as it turns out, the use_mm() case either, which can do
gup_fast(). Oh well.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists