[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180823075004.696753053@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:53:56 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.17 170/324] sched/util_est: Fix util_est_dequeue() for throttled cfs_rq
4.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
[ Upstream commit 3482d98bbc730758b63a5d1cf41d05ea17481412 ]
When a cfs_rq is throttled, parent cfs_rq->nr_running is decreased and
everything happens at cfs_rq level. Currently util_est stays unchanged
in such case and it keeps accounting the utilization of throttled tasks.
This can somewhat make sense as we don't dequeue tasks but only throttled
cfs_rq.
If a task of another group is enqueued/dequeued and root cfs_rq becomes
idle during the dequeue, util_est will be cleared whereas it was
accounting util_est of throttled tasks before. So the behavior of util_est
is not always the same regarding throttled tasks and depends of side
activity. Furthermore, util_est will not be updated when the cfs_rq is
unthrottled as everything happens at cfs_rq level. Main results is that
util_est will stay null whereas we now have running tasks. We have to wait
for the next dequeue/enqueue of the previously throttled tasks to get an
up to date util_est.
Remove the assumption that cfs_rq's estimated utilization of a CPU is 0
if there is no running task so the util_est of a task remains until the
latter is dequeued even if its cfs_rq has been throttled.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Fixes: 7f65ea42eb00 ("sched/fair: Add util_est on top of PELT")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1528972380-16268-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 16 ++++------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3941,18 +3941,10 @@ util_est_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
if (!sched_feat(UTIL_EST))
return;
- /*
- * Update root cfs_rq's estimated utilization
- *
- * If *p is the last task then the root cfs_rq's estimated utilization
- * of a CPU is 0 by definition.
- */
- ue.enqueued = 0;
- if (cfs_rq->nr_running) {
- ue.enqueued = cfs_rq->avg.util_est.enqueued;
- ue.enqueued -= min_t(unsigned int, ue.enqueued,
- (_task_util_est(p) | UTIL_AVG_UNCHANGED));
- }
+ /* Update root cfs_rq's estimated utilization */
+ ue.enqueued = cfs_rq->avg.util_est.enqueued;
+ ue.enqueued -= min_t(unsigned int, ue.enqueued,
+ (_task_util_est(p) | UTIL_AVG_UNCHANGED));
WRITE_ONCE(cfs_rq->avg.util_est.enqueued, ue.enqueued);
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists