linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.17 266/324] sched/deadline: Fix switched_from

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180823075009.287942287@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:55:32 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, claudio@...dence.eu.com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.17 266/324] sched/deadline: Fix switched_from_dl() warning

4.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit e117cb52bdb4d376b711bee34af6434c9e314b3b ]

Mark noticed that syzkaller is able to reliably trigger the following warning:

  dl_rq->running_bw > dl_rq->this_bw
  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 153 at kernel/sched/deadline.c:124 switched_from_dl+0x454/0x608
  Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...

  CPU: 1 PID: 153 Comm: syz-executor253 Not tainted 4.18.0-rc3+ #29
  Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
  Call trace:
   dump_backtrace+0x0/0x458
   show_stack+0x20/0x30
   dump_stack+0x180/0x250
   panic+0x2dc/0x4ec
   __warn_printk+0x0/0x150
   report_bug+0x228/0x2d8
   bug_handler+0xa0/0x1a0
   brk_handler+0x2f0/0x568
   do_debug_exception+0x1bc/0x5d0
   el1_dbg+0x18/0x78
   switched_from_dl+0x454/0x608
   __sched_setscheduler+0x8cc/0x2018
   sys_sched_setattr+0x340/0x758
   el0_svc_naked+0x30/0x34

syzkaller reproducer runs a bunch of threads that constantly switch
between DEADLINE and NORMAL classes while interacting through futexes.

The splat above is caused by the fact that if a DEADLINE task is setattr
back to NORMAL while in non_contending state (blocked on a futex -
inactive timer armed), its contribution to running_bw is not removed
before sub_rq_bw() gets called (!task_on_rq_queued() branch) and the
latter sees running_bw > this_bw.

Fix it by removing a task contribution from running_bw if the task is
not queued and in non_contending state while switched to a different
class.

Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: claudio@...dence.eu.com
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180711072948.27061-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c |   11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -2296,8 +2296,17 @@ static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *
 	if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && p->dl.dl_runtime)
 		task_non_contending(p);
 
-	if (!task_on_rq_queued(p))
+	if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) {
+		/*
+		 * Inactive timer is armed. However, p is leaving DEADLINE and
+		 * might migrate away from this rq while continuing to run on
+		 * some other class. We need to remove its contribution from
+		 * this rq running_bw now, or sub_rq_bw (below) will complain.
+		 */
+		if (p->dl.dl_non_contending)
+			sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
 		sub_rq_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * We cannot use inactive_task_timer() to invoke sub_running_bw()