linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.17 279/324] net/smc: reset recv timeout after clc handshake

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180823075009.964777024@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:55:45 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.17 279/324] net/smc: reset recv timeout after clc handshake

4.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit f6bdc42f021194ec095914b92c7a8b1a09789e6d ]

During clc handshake the receive timeout is set to CLC_WAIT_TIME.
Remember and reset the original timeout value after the receive calls,
and remove a duplicate assignment of CLC_WAIT_TIME.

Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/smc/smc_clc.c |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/net/smc/smc_clc.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_clc.c
@@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ out:
 int smc_clc_wait_msg(struct smc_sock *smc, void *buf, int buflen,
 		     u8 expected_type)
 {
+	long rcvtimeo = smc->clcsock->sk->sk_rcvtimeo;
 	struct sock *clc_sk = smc->clcsock->sk;
 	struct smc_clc_msg_hdr *clcm = buf;
 	struct msghdr msg = {NULL, 0};
@@ -306,7 +307,6 @@ int smc_clc_wait_msg(struct smc_sock *sm
 	memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(struct msghdr));
 	iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, READ | ITER_KVEC, &vec, 1, datlen);
 	krflags = MSG_WAITALL;
-	smc->clcsock->sk->sk_rcvtimeo = CLC_WAIT_TIME;
 	len = sock_recvmsg(smc->clcsock, &msg, krflags);
 	if (len < datlen || !smc_clc_msg_hdr_valid(clcm)) {
 		smc->sk.sk_err = EPROTO;
@@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ int smc_clc_wait_msg(struct smc_sock *sm
 	}
 
 out:
+	smc->clcsock->sk->sk_rcvtimeo = rcvtimeo;
 	return reason_code;
 }