linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.17 256/324] sfc: hold filter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180823075008.841081744@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:55:22 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Bert Kenward <bkenward@...arflare.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.17 256/324] sfc: hold filter_sem consistently during reset

4.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Bert Kenward <bkenward@...arflare.com>

[ Upstream commit 193f20033c54db0dc9563f722fbafbcd5fa0e80d ]

We should take and release the filter_sem consistently during the
reset process, in the same manner as the mac_lock and reset_lock.

For lockdep consistency we also take the filter_sem for write around
other calls to efx->type->init().

Fixes: c2bebe37c6b6 ("sfc: give ef10 its own rwsem in the filter table instead of filter_lock")
Signed-off-by: Bert Kenward <bkenward@...arflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c |   17 ++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c
@@ -1840,12 +1840,6 @@ static void efx_remove_filters(struct ef
 	up_write(&efx->filter_sem);
 }
 
-static void efx_restore_filters(struct efx_nic *efx)
-{
-	down_read(&efx->filter_sem);
-	efx->type->filter_table_restore(efx);
-	up_read(&efx->filter_sem);
-}
 
 /**************************************************************************
  *
@@ -2657,6 +2651,7 @@ void efx_reset_down(struct efx_nic *efx,
 	efx_disable_interrupts(efx);
 
 	mutex_lock(&efx->mac_lock);
+	down_write(&efx->filter_sem);
 	mutex_lock(&efx->rss_lock);
 	if (efx->port_initialized && method != RESET_TYPE_INVISIBLE &&
 	    method != RESET_TYPE_DATAPATH)
@@ -2714,9 +2709,8 @@ int efx_reset_up(struct efx_nic *efx, en
 	if (efx->type->rx_restore_rss_contexts)
 		efx->type->rx_restore_rss_contexts(efx);
 	mutex_unlock(&efx->rss_lock);
-	down_read(&efx->filter_sem);
-	efx_restore_filters(efx);
-	up_read(&efx->filter_sem);
+	efx->type->filter_table_restore(efx);
+	up_write(&efx->filter_sem);
 	if (efx->type->sriov_reset)
 		efx->type->sriov_reset(efx);
 
@@ -2733,6 +2727,7 @@ fail:
 	efx->port_initialized = false;
 
 	mutex_unlock(&efx->rss_lock);
+	up_write(&efx->filter_sem);
 	mutex_unlock(&efx->mac_lock);
 
 	return rc;
@@ -3440,7 +3435,9 @@ static int efx_pci_probe_main(struct efx
 
 	efx_init_napi(efx);
 
+	down_write(&efx->filter_sem);
 	rc = efx->type->init(efx);
+	up_write(&efx->filter_sem);
 	if (rc) {
 		netif_err(efx, probe, efx->net_dev,
 			  "failed to initialise NIC\n");
@@ -3729,7 +3726,9 @@ static int efx_pm_resume(struct device *
 	rc = efx->type->reset(efx, RESET_TYPE_ALL);
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
+	down_write(&efx->filter_sem);
 	rc = efx->type->init(efx);
+	up_write(&efx->filter_sem);
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
 	rc = efx_pm_thaw(dev);