linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support invalidating TLB caches for RCU_TABLE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <457fb409b4dcd213e2f162792e79e31c09cd55a4.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:   Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:21:30 +1000
From:   Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Adin Scannell <ascannell@...gle.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support invalidating TLB caches for
 RCU_TABLE_FREE

On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 22:11 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 9:54 PM Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@....ibm.com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > So we do need a different flush instruction for the page tables vs. the
> > normal TLB pages.
> 
> Right. ARM wants it too. x86 is odd in that a regular "invlpg" already
> invalidates all the internal tlb cache nodes.
> 
> So the "new world order" is exactly that patch that PeterZ sent you, that adds a
> 
> +       unsigned int            freed_tables : 1;
> 

 .../...

> So instead, when you get to the actual "tlb_flush(tlb)", you do
> exactly that - flush the tlb. And the mmu_gather structure shows you
> how much you need to flush. If you see that "freed_tables" is set,
> then you know that you need to also do the special instruction to
> flush the inner level caches. The range continues to show the page
> range.

Yup. That looks like a generic version of the "need_flush_all" flag we
have, which is fine by us.

Just don't blame powerpc for all the historical crap :-)

Cheers,
Ben.

> 
>            Linus