linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 206/217] netfilter: conntrack: dccp: treat SYNC/SYNCACK as invalid if no prior state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180823075514.952275719@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 23 Aug 2018 09:55:19 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+6f18401420df260e37ed@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 206/217] netfilter: conntrack: dccp: treat SYNC/SYNCACK as invalid if no prior state

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>

commit 6613b6173dee098997229caf1f3b961c49da75e6 upstream.

When first DCCP packet is SYNC or SYNCACK, we insert a new conntrack
that has an un-initialized timeout value, i.e. such entry could be
reaped at any time.

Mark them as INVALID and only ignore SYNC/SYNCACK when connection had
an old state.

Reported-by: syzbot+6f18401420df260e37ed@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_dccp.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_dccp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_dccp.c
@@ -243,14 +243,14 @@ dccp_state_table[CT_DCCP_ROLE_MAX + 1][D
 		 * We currently ignore Sync packets
 		 *
 		 *	sNO, sRQ, sRS, sPO, sOP, sCR, sCG, sTW */
-			sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG,
+			sIV, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG,
 		},
 		[DCCP_PKT_SYNCACK] = {
 		/*
 		 * We currently ignore SyncAck packets
 		 *
 		 *	sNO, sRQ, sRS, sPO, sOP, sCR, sCG, sTW */
-			sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG,
+			sIV, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG,
 		},
 	},
 	[CT_DCCP_ROLE_SERVER] = {
@@ -371,14 +371,14 @@ dccp_state_table[CT_DCCP_ROLE_MAX + 1][D
 		 * We currently ignore Sync packets
 		 *
 		 *	sNO, sRQ, sRS, sPO, sOP, sCR, sCG, sTW */
-			sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG,
+			sIV, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG,
 		},
 		[DCCP_PKT_SYNCACK] = {
 		/*
 		 * We currently ignore SyncAck packets
 		 *
 		 *	sNO, sRQ, sRS, sPO, sOP, sCR, sCG, sTW */
-			sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG,
+			sIV, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG, sIG,
 		},
 	},
 };