[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180824084157.GD29735@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 10:41:57 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] mm: migration: fix migration of huge PMD shared
pages
On Thu 23-08-18 13:59:16, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> The page migration code employs try_to_unmap() to try and unmap the
> source page. This is accomplished by using rmap_walk to find all
> vmas where the page is mapped. This search stops when page mapcount
> is zero. For shared PMD huge pages, the page map count is always 1
> no matter the number of mappings. Shared mappings are tracked via
> the reference count of the PMD page. Therefore, try_to_unmap stops
> prematurely and does not completely unmap all mappings of the source
> page.
>
> This problem can result is data corruption as writes to the original
> source page can happen after contents of the page are copied to the
> target page. Hence, data is lost.
>
> This problem was originally seen as DB corruption of shared global
> areas after a huge page was soft offlined due to ECC memory errors.
> DB developers noticed they could reproduce the issue by (hotplug)
> offlining memory used to back huge pages. A simple testcase can
> reproduce the problem by creating a shared PMD mapping (note that
> this must be at least PUD_SIZE in size and PUD_SIZE aligned (1GB on
> x86)), and using migrate_pages() to migrate process pages between
> nodes while continually writing to the huge pages being migrated.
>
> To fix, have the try_to_unmap_one routine check for huge PMD sharing
> by calling huge_pmd_unshare for hugetlbfs huge pages. If it is a
> shared mapping it will be 'unshared' which removes the page table
> entry and drops the reference on the PMD page. After this, flush
> caches and TLB.
>
> mmu notifiers are called before locking page tables, but we can not
> be sure of PMD sharing until page tables are locked. Therefore,
> check for the possibility of PMD sharing before locking so that
> notifiers can prepare for the worst possible case.
>
> Fixes: 39dde65c9940 ("shared page table for hugetlb page")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
One nit below.
[...]
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 3103099f64fd..a73c5728e961 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -4548,6 +4548,9 @@ static unsigned long page_table_shareable(struct vm_area_struct *svma,
> return saddr;
> }
>
> +#define _range_in_vma(vma, start, end) \
> + ((vma)->vm_start <= (start) && (end) <= (vma)->vm_end)
> +
static inline please. Macros and potential side effects on given
arguments are just not worth the risk. I also think this is something
for more general use. We have that pattern at many places. So I would
stick that to linux/mm.h
Thanks!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists