[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180824094742.GJ24142@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:47:42 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Miguel de Dios <migueldedios@...gle.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
Patrick Bellasi <Patrick.Bellasi@....com>,
Chris Redpath <Chris.Redpath@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
John Dias <joaodias@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: vruntime should normalize when switching
from fair
> > On 08/17/2018 11:27 AM, Steve Muckle wrote:
> > > When rt_mutex_setprio changes a task's scheduling class to RT,
> > > we're seeing cases where the task's vruntime is not updated
> > > correctly upon return to the fair class.
> > > Specifically, the following is being observed:
> > > - task is deactivated while still in the fair class
> > > - task is boosted to RT via rt_mutex_setprio, which changes
> > > the task to RT and calls check_class_changed.
> > > - check_class_changed leads to detach_task_cfs_rq, at which point
> > > the vruntime_normalized check sees that the task's state is TASK_WAKING,
> > > which results in skipping the subtraction of the rq's min_vruntime
> > > from the task's vruntime
> > > - later, when the prio is deboosted and the task is moved back
> > > to the fair class, the fair rq's min_vruntime is added to
> > > the task's vruntime, even though it wasn't subtracted earlier.
I'm thinking that is an incomplete scenario; where do we get to
TASK_WAKING.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists