[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e4862ca0-ccff-1662-0db2-86891b95f598@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:15:08 +0200
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
x86@...nel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
akataria@...are.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/11] x86/paravirt: move the Xen-only pv_mmu_ops under
the PARAVIRT_XXL umbrella
On 24/08/18 16:12, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 09:37:38AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> struct pv_mmu_ops {
>> + /* TLB operations */
>> + void (*flush_tlb_user)(void);
>> + void (*flush_tlb_kernel)(void);
>> + void (*flush_tlb_one_user)(unsigned long addr);
>> + void (*flush_tlb_others)(const struct cpumask *cpus,
>> + const struct flush_tlb_info *info);
>> +
>> + /* Hook for intercepting the destruction of an mm_struct. */
>> + void (*exit_mmap)(struct mm_struct *mm);
>
> Right, so I just wrecked that for you by adding a new:
> tlb_remove_table virt function. But I don't suppose that's a difficult
> thing to fix up.
Right. This will stay outside of XXL, I think. :-)
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists