[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180824182259.GA18477@roeck-us.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:22:59 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, luto@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org,
bp@...en8.de, riel@...riel.com, jannh@...gle.com,
ascannell@...gle.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm: mmu_notifier fix for tlb_end_vma (build
failures)
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 03:25:33PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 07:06:51AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 08/24/2018 06:50 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >
> > >>-#include <asm-generic/tlb.h>
> > >>+struct mmu_gather;
> > >> static inline void tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
> > >> {
> > >> flush_tlb_mm(tlb->mm);
> > >
> > >Bah, didn't spot the dereference so this won't work either. You basically
> > >just need to copy what I did for arm64 in d475fac95779.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, this seems to work. It doesn't really need "struct mmu_gather;" -
> > I assume that is included from elsewhere - but I added it to be safe.
>
> struct mmu_gather comes in via asm-generic/tlb.h.
>
>From linux/mm.h, really, which happens to be included before
asm/tlb.h is included (see arch/riscv/include/asm/pgalloc.h).
I kept it to be future-proof.
> > Can you send a full patch, or do you want me to do it ?
>
> I'm evidently incapable of writing code today, so please go ahead :)
>
Done. We'll see if I am any better.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists