linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH] x86/vdso: Handle clock_gettime(CLOCK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALAqxLXk3shySjd7__Rxvegw-dUDETmAmVOPR6Oto0j3mpZv5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:25:29 -0700
From:   John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:     Matt Rickard <matt@...trans.com.au>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] x86/vdso: Handle clock_gettime(CLOCK_TAI) in vDSO

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> Minor nit: if it's not literally a resend, don't call it "RESEND" in
> $SUBJECT.  Call it v2, please.
>
> Also, I added LKML and relevant maintainers to cc.  John and Stephen:
> this is a purely x86 patch, but it digs into the core timekeeping
> structures a bit.

>From a quick review, looks reasonable, so no objections from me.

thanks
-john