[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180824191749.GA15489@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 21:17:49 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
matt@...eblueprint.co.uk, bp@...e.de,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, luto@...nel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, bp@...en8.de,
brgerst@...il.com, davej@...emonkey.org.uk, dvlasenk@...hat.com,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, toshi.kani@...com,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Yazen.Ghannam@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 103/105] Revert "x86/mm/pat: Ensure cpa->pfn only
contains page frame numbers"
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:08:28AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > See
> > <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1512686629.18523.217.camel@codethink.co.uk/T/#u>.
>
> Thanks! I'm not using SGI UV and I'm not using kexec, so I guess I
> sidestepped most of those issues. Greg, I think we need to unrevert
> the cpa->pfn change (otherwise the L1TF fix probably gets pretty
> messy) and I guess pull in the other patches that Ben mentions.
Ok, so what patch should be reverted? I'm seeing other reports of
problems all around this same area, but I can't figure out exactly what
to do.
Guenter, any ideas?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists