linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: fix parsing aarch64 branch instructions after objdump update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180824164506.aa6e54bceb1ffb7b3dc70733@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:45:06 -0500
From:   Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
To:     Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@...il.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        perf group <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: fix parsing aarch64 branch instructions
 after objdump update

On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:59:22 +0200
Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 08/24/2018 02:10 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > Tested no difference in output for sample x86_64, power arch perf.data files.
> 
> Tested,  no difference in output on s390. Just to let you know.

Thanks!  An official Tested-by: tag would help keep acme from guessing
whether he should convert these less-officially sounding types of
emails in the future.  I doubt your official Tested-by implies you
necessarily have had to claim you fully tested it on e.g., x86-64, esp.
if your Tested-by is in such context as provided above.

BTW, if you want to send me an s390 perf.data file and the file
resulting from 'perf archive', and a matching vmlinux in an off-list
email, I can add it to my perf-archives arsenal for future testing.

Again, thanks for testing!

Kim