[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180825150723.GA10230@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2018 17:07:23 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
matt@...eblueprint.co.uk, bp@...e.de,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, luto@...nel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>, bp@...en8.de,
brgerst@...il.com, davej@...emonkey.org.uk, dvlasenk@...hat.com,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, toshi.kani@...com,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Yazen.Ghannam@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 103/105] Revert "x86/mm/pat: Ensure cpa->pfn only
contains page frame numbers"
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 06:52:32AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi Roland,
>
> On 08/24/2018 01:04 PM, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > Ok, so what patch should be reverted? I'm seeing other reports of
> > > problems all around this same area, but I can't figure out exactly what
> > > to do.
> >
> > Are any of those reports public? If so can you point me at them, I'm
> > curious if the symptoms match up.
> >
> > I don't think we want to revert anything. I think you should pull in
> > edc3b9129cec and at least the first three patches that Ben listed:
> >
> > 21cdb6b56843 x86/mm: Page align the '_end' symbol to avoid pfn conversion bugs
> > b61a76f8850d x86/efi: Map RAM into the identity page table for mixed mode
> > 753b11ef8e92 x86/efi: Setup separate EFI page tables in kexec paths
> >
> > the first patch takes a bit of massaging (mostly because some of it is
> > already touched by 02ff2769edbc, which keeps the changes from
> > edc3b9129cec, and so we can drop a good bit when applying). The other
> > three apply cleanly.
> >
> > I'm currently testing that and can send you the state of my tree in a bit.
> >
>
> Have you made any progress ? On my side I am still out of luck since I can not
> reproduce the problem.
Perhaps just the patch that Andi posted to the stable list helps out
here?
Roland, can you try just that?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists