linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] spi: Fix double IDR allocation with DT aliases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180826132415.GB2414@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Sun, 26 Aug 2018 14:24:15 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Kirill Kapranov <kirill.kapranov@...pulab.co.il>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] spi: Fix double IDR allocation with DT aliases

On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 08:54:53PM +0300, Kirill Kapranov wrote:
> > For DT systems the dynamically allocated IDs start at the maximum
> > positive ID and work down so in practice it is vanishingly unlikely that
> > there will be a collision as idiomatic static DT IDs would be low
> > integers.
> 
> Yes, this algorithm seems really bullet-proof. However, it isn't actually
> used now. The ID allocation algorithm using  atomic_dec_return call had been
> introduced 2006-01-08 as [1]. It was being used in the mainline kernel (with
> some improvements) up to 2017-08-16, when it has been replaced with the
> newer algorithm using Linux idr, accordingly [2].

Please include human readable descriptions of things like commits and
issues being discussed in e-mail in your mails, this makes them much
easier for humans to read especially when they have no internet access.
I do frequently catch up on my mail on flights or while otherwise
travelling so this is even more pressing for me than just being about
making things a bit easier to read.

> Since idr_alloc call works incrementally, the situation of a 'fixed' ID
> squatting by a driver with 'dynamic ID' seems more than possible.
> Therefore it would be justified to use a hardcoded constant
> SPI_DYN_FIRST_BUS_NUM (that was introduced in [2] and eliminated in [3]),
> but with a sufficiently greater value of the constant.

Right, that clearly wasn't an intended effect, though - should be using
the max of the big constant and the maximum static ID.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)