[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180826170433.GA728@sol.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 10:04:34 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chucklever@...il.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@...gle.com>,
Victor Hsieh <victorhsieh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 02/10] fs-verity: add data verification hooks for
->readpages()
Hi Chuck,
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 11:55:57AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * fsverity_verify_page - verify a data page
> > + *
> > + * Verify a page that has just been read from a file against that file's Merkle
> > + * tree. The page is assumed to be a pagecache page.
> > + *
> > + * Return: true if the page is valid, else false.
> > + */
> > +bool fsverity_verify_page(struct page *data_page)
> > +{
> > + struct inode *inode = data_page->mapping->host;
> > + const struct fsverity_info *vi = get_fsverity_info(inode);
> > + struct ahash_request *req;
> > + bool valid;
> > +
> > + req = ahash_request_alloc(vi->hash_alg->tfm, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (unlikely(!req))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + valid = verify_page(inode, vi, req, data_page);
> > +
> > + ahash_request_free(req);
> > +
> > + return valid;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fsverity_verify_page);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * fsverity_verify_bio - verify a 'read' bio that has just completed
> > + *
> > + * Verify a set of pages that have just been read from a file against that
> > + * file's Merkle tree. The pages are assumed to be pagecache pages. Pages that
> > + * fail verification are set to the Error state. Verification is skipped for
> > + * pages already in the Error state, e.g. due to fscrypt decryption failure.
> > + */
> > +void fsverity_verify_bio(struct bio *bio)
>
> Hi Eric-
>
> This kind of API won't work for remote filesystems, which do not use
> "struct bio" to do their I/O. Could a remote filesystem solely use
> fsverity_verify_page instead?
>
Yes, filesystems don't have to use fsverity_verify_bio(). They can call
fsverity_verify_page() on each page instead. I will clarify this in the next
revision of the patchset.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists